Storm Clouds Gathering: How Economic Headwinds Threaten Urban Regeneration

The ambitious vision of urban regeneration – revitalising communities, creating affordable housing, and building sustainable futures – is facing a significant headwind: a challenging economic climate.

S&P Global UK Construction PMI produced a report last week showing UK construction activity falling at its sharpest rate since the Covid-19 pandemic. Higher financing costs, soaring inflation, and persistent supply chain disruptions are casting a long shadow over projects across the UK and are threatening to derail progress.

The Perfect Storm for Developers:

UK developers are caught in a perfect storm. Higher interest rates make borrowing significantly more expensive, increasing the financial burden of already complex projects. Inflation simultaneously drives up the cost of materials, labour, and land, squeezing profit margins and making projects less attractive to investors.

This double whammy isn’t just about reduced profitability; it’s about viability. Projects that were once considered sound investments are increasingly becoming unfeasible, leading to delays, budget overruns, or even outright cancellations. The ripple effect of supply chain disruptions further complicates matters, causing delays and uncertainty in material availability, adding yet another layer of complexity and cost.

An example of stalled regeneration; The Broad Marsh site in Nottingham. Plagued by micro and local issues causing delay, and without significant Government intervention is likely to be compounded by the wider macro economic headwinds. Homes England stepped in earlier this year and acquired the site from Nottingham City Council.

The Community Impact: A Broken Promise?

The consequences extend far beyond the balance sheets of developers and investors. The communities these projects aim to serve are at risk of bearing the brunt of this imbalance. The most immediate and concerning impact is on affordable housing. Increased development costs can translate into higher asking prices, potentially pricing vulnerable communities out of the very homes these regeneration projects were intended to provide. The dream of affordable, quality housing risks becoming a broken promise.

Furthermore, the pressure to control costs may lead to compromises on design quality. Cutting corners on quality, particular material quality can result in less durable, and less sustainable buildings. It can compromise long-term value and potentially impact the health and well-being of residents. The vision of vibrant, sustainable communities could be replaced by a patchwork of hastily constructed, less desirable spaces.

Delays and cancellations are equally devastating. Communities eagerly anticipating improved infrastructure, new amenities, and revitalised public spaces find themselves left waiting, potentially exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities. The longer the wait, the greater the risk that the momentum for positive change is lost.

Navigating the Challenges: A Call for Collaboration:

The challenges are significant, but not insurmountable. Addressing this crisis requires a collaborative effort between governments, developers, investors, and communities. Government intervention, in the form of public sector grants / loans, tax incentives, and embracing private sector partnerships, is crucial to supporting the viability of affordable housing projects and ensuring that regeneration efforts aren’t stifled by economic headwinds.

It is hard to see whether sustainable design and construction methods will be prioritised in the short-term given the immediate challenges, and therefore it is imperative on those working in the industry to demonstrate the long-term benefits to investors and how this impacts their wallet.

On the planning front, the industry is waiting with baited breathe on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, with the Government announcing that it intends to “streamline planning and consenting processes, modernise planning committees… and enhance the performance of local planning authorities”. We have all heard this one before, however the wider financial challenges places renewed focus on our governing system. The Government cannot afford to get this one wrong.

Finally, maintaining robust community engagement is paramount, ensuring that the voices of those most affected are heard and that projects remain responsive to their needs.

The Future of Regeneration:

The current economic climate presents a significant test for urban regeneration. However, by proactively addressing the challenges and fostering collaboration, we can ensure that these vital projects continue to deliver on their promise of creating vibrant, sustainable, and equitable communities for all. The alternative – a retreat from ambitious regeneration plans – would be a significant setback, leaving communities vulnerable and hindering the creation of the thriving, inclusive places we all deserve.

Sources:

S&P Global – UK construction activity falls at sharpest rate in over five years

FT – Rachel Reeves orders fresh planning overhaul for ‘critical’ infrastructure projects

Same Metcalf (the Business Desk) – The lost decade – how Broad Marsh mistakes set Nottingham back

What would a Labour Government mean for housing?

Following the Autumn Statement last Wednesday, political commentators believe that signs are increasingly pointing towards a Spring 2024 General Election.

The latest opinion polls from Politico show that the UK Voting Intention for the Labour Party is at 44%, consistently polling ahead of the Conservative & Unionist Party at 24%.

A key question being asked by those in the industry is what a potential Labour Government means for UK housing. The Leader of the Labour Party, Sir Kier Starmer, has signalled his intention to reintroduce the national housing targets, something which the current Levelling Up Secretary, Michael Gove, stated was always “optional”. Having consistently failed to meet the 300,000 home per annum target for England (a revised target set by the Government in November 2017), it’s perhaps not a surprise the current Government has changed its tone.

Starmer has placed significant importance on house building, with the first of his five pledges being “Get Britain building again”. It shows housebuilding being a core part of Labour’s plan. As announced at the party conference, Labour has committed to building 1.5 million new homes by the end of their first term, reforming the planning system, boosting affordable housing, delivering the next generation of new towns, delivering a package of devolution to Mayors, with stronger powers over planning and control over housing investment, fast-tracking high density on urban brownfield land, and supporting first-time buyers.

What is lacking is detail around each of these commitments, the ‘how’. There are some snippets of how Labour proposes to deliver on these commitments, principally in three key areas:

1.      Work with Councils to draw up and agree Local Plans which has stalled and supporting this by recruiting hundreds of extra planners.

2.      Strengthen requirements to approve new homes in areas that do not have up-to-date Local Plans, intervening to approve new homes in poorly performing areas, (including using call-in powers in the most extreme cases).

3.      Boost affordable housing Reform S106 Agreements (planning charges) with added flexibility in the Affordable Homes Programme.

Paintworks Phase 3 in Bristol, a scheme I visited early this year which achieved practical completion in 2018. An inspiring place to visit, a former Victorian paint and varnish factory running along the River Avon. A mixed use scheme and from a design perspective extraordinary. The down side? Very low affordable housing at 5%… a story of the last 13 years of the UK housebuilding.

A key theme running through the first and second point ultimately comes back to properly resourcing the planning system. Recruiting planners to the industry and properly investing in the profession is fundamental. We can be as radical with planning reform as we want, but if we do not value the people working within it and give them the resource required, then change cannot come about.

On the second point, there is still a “get out of jail” statement using call-in powers in the most extreme cases. In terms of intervening to approve new homes in poorly performing areas, it feels like this could be linked back to the planning reform point. It could, however, mean following the trend which the current Government is on in threatening to designate certain Local Authorities as underperforming, which passes planning authority powers over to the Planning Inspectorate.

On the third point, it feels somewhat unrealistic to assume that S106 reforms alone can solve the affordable housing crisis. There is nothing in this that talks about funding local authorities, bringing in rent controls, funding the existing housing stock, or reimagining the current affordable housing programs. Yes, planning charges should be looked at as part of a wider suite of measures, but this shouldn’t be done in isolation.

In short, there isn’t enough to dig into the detail at this stage. The signals are good, but then again, aren’t they always?


Sources:

Could Rishi Sunak be gearing up for a spring election? | The Independent

POLITICO Poll of Polls — British polls, trends and election news for the United Kingdom and Scotland – POLITICO

Michael Gove claims government’s 300,000 housebuilding target was always optional | The Independent

‘How’, not ‘if’: Labour will jump start planning to build 1.5 million homes and save the dream of homeownership – The Labour Party